From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kay Sievers Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 08:03:50 +0000 Subject: Re: udev zombies Message-Id: <20040604080350.GA10482@vrfy.org> List-Id: References: <200406011914.13245.mbuesch@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <200406011914.13245.mbuesch@freenet.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 08:45:31PM -0500, jnf wrote: > looking through udevd.c right now at the signal handling routines, I see > that sig_handler is the routine called by all of the custom signal > handlers and it is just a switch statement and tests for SIGINT, SIGTERM > SIGALRM and SIGCHLD, so in theory [obviously nothing works as it should in > theory], we should never see the default statement, which is what we are > seeing- I havent had much of a chance to look at it, but i noticied this > line: > act.sa_andler = sig_handler; > > is that a typo, or is there something I'm not understanding? Shouldn't > that be act.sa_handler? I just changed the dbg() statement from unhandled > signal to dbg("unhandled signal number #\n", signum);, so im going to > reboot in a moment and then try to cause it to recieve the signal, also > its my gf's birthday so I won't have much more time tonight to play. Come on, how can you compile this? I can't find this "typo" in the code. thanks, Kay ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel