From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 23:57:51 +0000 Subject: Re: Delayed hotplug events Message-Id: <20040617235751.GB5465@kroah.com> List-Id: References: <40D17ECC.20501@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <40D17ECC.20501@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 03:22:07PM -0500, linas@austin.ibm.com wrote: > > By contrast, I can't see what's architecturally unclean about > having device drivers make the call as to when they think they > are finally up and ready to go, e.g. by making one puny subroutine > call at the end of thier init sequence. Why would this be a bad idea? Because it would be a major architecture change in the middle of a stable kernel series. I'm not going to agree to do that at this time. Sorry, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel