* Re: udev housekeeping
2004-12-05 6:25 udev housekeeping Kay Sievers
@ 2004-12-05 8:34 ` Greg KH
2004-12-05 19:24 ` Kay Sievers
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2004-12-05 8:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hotplug
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 07:25:37AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> We have several files laying around in the tree, which should be updated
> or deleted:
>
> Not useful anymore:
> etc/conf.d/udev
This came from Red Hat, they don't use it anymore in their rpm?
> etc/dev.d/default/dbus.dev
Now deleted.
> etc/dev.d/default/selinux.dev
Now deleted.
> test/udevd_test.sh
Now deleted.
> test/wait_for_sysfs_test.sh
Hm, I liked this script... oh well, it's gone.
> RH specific and different from current RH version:
> etc/dev.d/default/pam_console.dev
Care to provide the latest version?
> Calls udev binary for every node. Should be deleted or converted
> to use udevstart:
> etc/init.d/udev
Deleted.
> etc/init.d/udev.init.LSB
Converted.
> etc/init.d/udev.init.lfs
Converted.
> etc/extras/start_udev
Left alone, I want to keep that logic around somewhere :)
> Most of them are broken an replaced by udev-test.pl:
> test/ignore_test
delted.
> test/label_test
deleted
> test/modifier_test
deleted
> test/net_test
Left alone, as we don't test this in udev-test.pl (yeah, it's broken,
but it can work by hand.)
> test/replace_test
deleted.
> test/test.all
> test/test.block
> test/test.tty
Left alone, they are good for debugging at times.
> test/testd.block
Hm, I don't remember even why I added this :)
> test/topo_test
deleted
> test/devd_test
Nah, I'll leave this if I need to verify the dev.d stuff again.
Thanks for pointing this all out.
greg k-h
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: udev housekeeping
2004-12-05 6:25 udev housekeeping Kay Sievers
2004-12-05 8:34 ` Greg KH
@ 2004-12-05 19:24 ` Kay Sievers
2004-12-06 23:02 ` Greg KH
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kay Sievers @ 2004-12-05 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hotplug
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 00:34 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 07:25:37AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > We have several files laying around in the tree, which should be updated
> > or deleted:
> >
> > Not useful anymore:
> > etc/conf.d/udev
>
> This came from Red Hat, they don't use it anymore in their rpm?
No, seems gone.
> > RH specific and different from current RH version:
> > etc/dev.d/default/pam_console.dev
>
> Care to provide the latest version?
Will do it.
> > Calls udev binary for every node. Should be deleted or converted
> > to use udevstart:
> > etc/init.d/udev
>
> Deleted.
We have a logic in our Makefile to install an init script, this fails now on
Fedora, cause this script is gone :) Some extended version of start_udev is
called from /etc/rc.sysinit instead.
We may remove the "install-initscript" target completely from the Makefile?
Thanks,
Kay
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: udev housekeeping
2004-12-05 6:25 udev housekeeping Kay Sievers
2004-12-05 8:34 ` Greg KH
2004-12-05 19:24 ` Kay Sievers
@ 2004-12-06 23:02 ` Greg KH
2004-12-07 16:34 ` Kay Sievers
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2004-12-06 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hotplug
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:24:41PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>
> We have a logic in our Makefile to install an init script, this fails now on
> Fedora, cause this script is gone :) Some extended version of start_udev is
> called from /etc/rc.sysinit instead.
>
> We may remove the "install-initscript" target completely from the Makefile?
Yes, that's a good idea.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: udev housekeeping
2004-12-05 6:25 udev housekeeping Kay Sievers
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-06 23:02 ` Greg KH
@ 2004-12-07 16:34 ` Kay Sievers
2004-12-07 16:38 ` Kay Sievers
2004-12-07 17:52 ` Greg KH
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kay Sievers @ 2004-12-07 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hotplug
On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 15:02 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:24:41PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >
> > We have a logic in our Makefile to install an init script, this fails now on
> > Fedora, cause this script is gone :) Some extended version of start_udev is
> > called from /etc/rc.sysinit instead.
> >
> > We may remove the "install-initscript" target completely from the Makefile?
>
> Yes, that's a good idea.
I've removed it in my tree along with the unused conf.d/
Please pull along with all the other changes from:
bk://vrfy.bkbits.net/udev
Thanks,
Kay
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: udev housekeeping
2004-12-05 6:25 udev housekeeping Kay Sievers
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-07 16:34 ` Kay Sievers
@ 2004-12-07 16:38 ` Kay Sievers
2004-12-07 17:52 ` Greg KH
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kay Sievers @ 2004-12-07 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hotplug
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 20:24 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 00:34 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 07:25:37AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > We have several files laying around in the tree, which should be updated
> > > or deleted:
> > > RH specific and different from current RH version:
> > > etc/dev.d/default/pam_console.dev
> >
> > Care to provide the latest version?
>
> Will do it.
I've updated it to the latest version now.
Thanks,
Kay
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: udev housekeeping
2004-12-05 6:25 udev housekeeping Kay Sievers
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-07 16:38 ` Kay Sievers
@ 2004-12-07 17:52 ` Greg KH
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2004-12-07 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hotplug
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 05:34:12PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 15:02 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:24:41PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > >
> > > We have a logic in our Makefile to install an init script, this fails now on
> > > Fedora, cause this script is gone :) Some extended version of start_udev is
> > > called from /etc/rc.sysinit instead.
> > >
> > > We may remove the "install-initscript" target completely from the Makefile?
> >
> > Yes, that's a good idea.
>
> I've removed it in my tree along with the unused conf.d/
>
> Please pull along with all the other changes from:
> bk://vrfy.bkbits.net/udev
Pulled from.
Hm. Anything anyone can think of that would prevent me from making a
new udev release today?
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread