From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug#286040: please allow permissions.d to follow symlinks
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:40:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041217134048.GA9527@wonderland.linux.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041217083115.GA4050@wonderland.linux.it>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 394 bytes --]
On Dec 17, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote:
> Why you guys always want to make things more complicated as needed?
Correctly handling permissions of symlinked nodes is consistency, not
complexity.
There is no reason to change the link owner or permissions, so it should
be obvious that it's the linked file which should be changed.
--
ciao, |
Marco | [9876 seJzaYXFfXXiU]
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-17 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-17 8:31 Bug#286040: please allow permissions.d to follow symlinks Marco d'Itri
2004-12-17 10:11 ` Stefan Schweizer
2004-12-17 10:48 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-17 13:24 ` Kay Sievers
2004-12-17 13:38 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-17 13:40 ` Marco d'Itri [this message]
2004-12-17 13:45 ` Kay Sievers
2004-12-17 13:47 ` Kay Sievers
2004-12-17 13:49 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-12-17 13:56 ` Kay Sievers
2004-12-17 13:58 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-17 14:13 ` Kay Sievers
2004-12-17 14:19 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-17 14:20 ` Kay Sievers
2004-12-17 14:35 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-17 14:36 ` Stefan Schweizer
2004-12-17 14:42 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-17 14:45 ` Kay Sievers
2004-12-17 14:52 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-17 15:50 ` Greg KH
2004-12-17 16:14 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-17 16:45 ` Greg KH
2004-12-17 17:10 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-17 17:45 ` Stefan Schweizer
2004-12-17 18:33 ` Greg KH
2004-12-17 18:40 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-17 23:25 ` Kay Sievers
2004-12-17 23:41 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-18 0:25 ` Lindsay Haisley
2004-12-18 0:53 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-18 1:18 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-18 3:04 ` Greg KH
2004-12-18 4:18 ` Lindsay Haisley
2004-12-18 4:21 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-18 9:48 ` Stefan Schweizer
2004-12-18 12:33 ` Tobias Klauser
2004-12-18 13:04 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-12-19 4:34 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-12-20 9:39 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-20 17:56 ` Lindsay Haisley
2004-12-20 18:04 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-20 19:05 ` Lindsay Haisley
2004-12-21 8:04 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-21 16:11 ` Lindsay Haisley
2004-12-21 16:31 ` Lindsay Haisley
2004-12-21 16:38 ` martin f krafft
2004-12-21 16:48 ` Tobias Klauser
2004-12-21 16:54 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041217134048.GA9527@wonderland.linux.it \
--to=md@linux.it \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).