From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Mansfield Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:05:42 +0000 Subject: Re: udev: provide temporary device nodes for callouts Message-Id: <20050210180542.GA16590@us.ibm.com> List-Id: References: <20050210111951.GA6920@vrfy.org> In-Reply-To: <20050210111951.GA6920@vrfy.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:43:34AM -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > > Why was the test passing? > I was confused by the test rule that was *not* supposed to match, i.e. this is easier to read: === test/udev-test.pl 1.80 vs edited ==--- 1.80/test/udev-test.pl Thu Feb 10 02:46:49 2005 +++ edited/test/udev-test.pl Thu Feb 10 10:03:59 2005 @@ -1066,9 +1066,9 @@ desc => "temporary node creation test", subsys => "block", devpath => "/block/sda", - exp_name => "sda", + exp_name => "node", conf => <