From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 16:09:12 +0000 Subject: Re: new release of udev? Message-Id: <20050519160912.GA14413@wonderland.linux.it> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK" List-Id: References: <20050519065848.GA25640@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20050519065848.GA25640@kroah.com> To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On May 19, Kay Sievers wrote: > > As I explained in our private discussion, this is complex and does not > > solve the SYMLINK problem: users would still not be able to override > > the distribution SYMLINK directives without using last_rule, which is > > not an option because it breaks RUN processing. > Well, SYMLINK is a list not a single value. Why does someone want to > supress the additional system-supplied symlinks? Why not? I think it's a very reasonable request. Different people have different ideas about /dev. --=20 ciao, Marco --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCjLonFGfw2OHuP7ERAmB1AJ42Zo8m+sfTqHFmAkrL48w6ccG/4QCgh/4j nRR2KoBM/WIxGWr19V7iXw0= =0Qyn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK-- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel