From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kay Sievers Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:10:29 +0000 Subject: Re: udev-067 and 2.6.12? Message-Id: <20050817151029.GA19505@vrfy.org> List-Id: References: <200508162349.01610.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <200508162349.01610.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 03:52:26PM +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote: > On Wednesday 17 August 2005 13:35, Kay Sievers wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:26:08AM +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote: > [snip] > > > No. I typed "make" and edited nothing. I'm sceptical that this is a > > > problem with "only" my configuration, since I've compiled literally > > > hundreds of packages with a problem, and run_directory/ is the only thing > > > I've ever seen not link bizarrely. I think the problem is that it's a > > > mistake to use ld explicitly to link in the case where I want to also > > > link in libc, and not use klibc. Many of the missing symbols were from > > > libc. > > > > You may need to run make from the top-level directory of of the udev > > tree with "make EXTRAS=extras/run_directory"? > > [alistair] 15:34 [~/udev-067] make extras/run_directory Seems you didn't you try what I wrote in the last mail: make EXTRAS=extras/run_directory Kay ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel