Re: udevsynthesize as a udevstart+coldplug replacement

[md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 779 bytes --]

On Aug 24, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote:

> > What about a new udevcontrol parameter which makes it block until the
> > udevd is done?
> What state is "udevd is done"? No event in the queue?
Unless you can think about something smarter, yes.

> > This way if needed it could be run in a different init
> > script to allow parallel processing at boot time.
> Hmm, what do you mean? Who waits for whom?
multiple init scripts would depend on the udev-done (or something like
this) init script, which will not terminale until udevcontrol will.
This way other init scripts would be able to continue working without
needing to wait for udev.
Or maybe it's not worth the effort, because they would need to use
/some/ device node anyway.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]