linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
	Roderich.Schupp.extern@mch.siemens.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: Race between "mount" uevent and /proc/mounts?
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:54:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051101195449.GA9162@procyon.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051101035816.GA7788@vrfy.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1946 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 04:58:16AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:28:46AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > Ok, makes sense. The attached seems to work for me. If we can get
> > something like this, we can remove the superblock claim/release events
> > completely and just read the events from the /proc/mounts file itself.

No, we need both events.  When you need to tell the user when it is
safe to disconnect the storage device, the event from detach_mnt() is
useless - it happens too early.  In fact, even the current way of
sending the event from kill_block_super() is broken, because the event
is generated before generic_shutdown_super() and sync_blockdev(), and
writing out cached data may take some time.

We could try to emit busy/free events from bd_claim() and
bd_release(); this would be triggered by most "interesting" users
(even opens with O_EXCL), but not by things like volume_id.

> New patch. Missed a check for namespace == NULL in detach_mnt().
[skip]
> +static unsigned int mounts_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
> +{
> +	struct task_struct *task = proc_task(file->f_dentry->d_inode);
> +	struct namespace *namespace;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	task_lock(task);
> +	namespace = task->namespace;
> +	if (namespace)
> +		get_namespace(namespace);
> +	task_unlock(task);
> +
> +	if (!namespace)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	poll_wait(file, &mounts_wait, wait);
> +	if (namespace->mounts_poll_pending) {
> +		namespace->mounts_poll_pending = 0;
> +		ret = POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
> +	}

This assumes that there will be only one process per namespace which
will call poll() on /proc/mounts.  Even though someone may argue that
it is the right approach (have a single process which watches
/proc/mounts and broadcasts updates to other interested processes,
e.g., over dbus), with the above implementation any unprivileged user
can call poll() and interfere with the operation of that designated
process.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-01 19:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <0AD07C7729CA42458B22AFA9C72E7011C8EF@mhha22kc.mchh.siemens.de>
     [not found] ` <20051025140041.GO7992@ftp.linux.org.uk>
2005-10-26 10:27   ` Race between "mount" uevent and /proc/mounts? Sergey Vlasov
2005-10-26 11:15     ` Al Viro
2005-10-26 14:34       ` Kay Sievers
2005-10-26 14:45         ` Xavier Bestel
2005-10-26 19:28         ` Al Viro
2005-11-01  0:28           ` Kay Sievers
2005-11-01  3:58             ` Kay Sievers
2005-11-01 19:54               ` Sergey Vlasov [this message]
2005-11-01 21:35                 ` Kay Sievers
2005-11-02 13:01                   ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-11-03  8:07                     ` Al Viro
2005-11-03 10:52                       ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-11-03 11:30                         ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051101195449.GA9162@procyon.home \
    --to=vsu@altlinux.ru \
    --cc=Roderich.Schupp.extern@mch.siemens.de \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).