From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:14:29 +0000 Subject: Re: udev & HDD LED Message-Id: <20060129171429.GA10825@kroah.com> List-Id: References: <43DC2457.3030001@warpmail.net> In-Reply-To: <43DC2457.3030001@warpmail.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 10:34:07AM -0500, Jesse Merriman wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > So if you use a static /dev, the light goes off, with the exact same > > kernel version that if you use udev, it goes on? > > Yep. > > > > What kernel version? > > 2.6.12-r10, which I believe is the last one to offer a devfs/udev choice. That's now what I said above, I'm not interested in devfs vs. udev comparison here (devfs did all sorts of different things that I don't want to dig into), I'm curious about a "static /dev tree" vs. udev. Can you test that on a 2.6.15 kernel? thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel