Re: WAIT_FOR_SYSFS ignores further conditions

[Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>]

On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 03:30:48PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 07:37:00PM +0300, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > On Sunday 29 January 2006 15:00, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > > Is it intentional? It looks rather like copy'n'paste slip. Patch attached.
> > 
> > This actually fixed a real bug here (every rule having WAIT_FOR_SYSFS was 
> > executed, not the one with mathing SYSFS value); so if there is something 
> > wrong with this patch I appreciate if someone explains what.
> 
> Correct, it doesn't work the way you use it and it should be fixed. I'll go
> look into this later this week.

Works for me now. But WAIT_FOR_SYSFS should still only be placed in the
first rules file, so that no other user of udev rules would see the
same race.

I still hope to fix all the issues some day in the kernel. In the past
we got several pages of rules built into udev, today there are only a
very few rules left and udev itself does not wait for anything, so things
look promising. :)

Thanks,
Kay


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid\x103432&bid#0486&dat\x121642
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel