From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kay Sievers Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:05:56 +0000 Subject: Re: WAIT_FOR_SYSFS ignores further conditions Message-Id: <20060203130556.GC16896@vrfy.org> List-Id: References: <200601291500.15527.arvidjaar@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <200601291500.15527.arvidjaar@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 03:30:48PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 07:37:00PM +0300, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > On Sunday 29 January 2006 15:00, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > > Is it intentional? It looks rather like copy'n'paste slip. Patch attached. > > > > This actually fixed a real bug here (every rule having WAIT_FOR_SYSFS was > > executed, not the one with mathing SYSFS value); so if there is something > > wrong with this patch I appreciate if someone explains what. > > Correct, it doesn't work the way you use it and it should be fixed. I'll go > look into this later this week. Works for me now. But WAIT_FOR_SYSFS should still only be placed in the first rules file, so that no other user of udev rules would see the same race. I still hope to fix all the issues some day in the kernel. In the past we got several pages of rules built into udev, today there are only a very few rules left and udev itself does not wait for anything, so things look promising. :) Thanks, Kay ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel