From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kay Sievers Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 16:21:51 +0000 Subject: Re: /dev/.udev/failed/devices@... problems Message-Id: <20060307162151.GA7548@vrfy.org> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:30:30PM +0100, Liontos Aristotelis wrote: > > On 2/18/06, Kay Sievers wrote: > > > I's unlikely. The "failed" events are created if one or more of the > > > configured RUN= programs returns non-zero. Usually this is not a problem > > > and can safely be ignored and seen as udev's "private" data used for > > > coldplug. > > > If they should go away, the rule writers must make sure, that the called > > > tools don't return a failure or maybe should not called at all for these > > > devices. > The system is up and running for weeks and its stable.No error > messages in the logs and udev with dbus and hal work as expected. > There are still 24 devices under failed but as you said they dont > cause any problem.(Maybe a sysfs related problem ?) Yeah, this is not a "problem" at all, and definitely nothing sysfs related. It is just a script called by udev which returns non-zero. That could be "fixed" by your distro just for cosmetic reasons, but you can also safely ignore it, if everything works fine. Kay ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel