From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kay Sievers Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:51:07 +0000 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] udev 089 release Message-Id: <20060405185107.GA21206@vrfy.org> List-Id: References: <20060403171123.GA24860@vrfy.org> In-Reply-To: <20060403171123.GA24860@vrfy.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:25:34AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 19:11 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > > > Provide "udevtrigger" program to request events on coldplug. The > > shell script is much too slow with thousends of devices. > > > How does this differ from our "udevplug" ? :) It simply triggers events for all devices. And the logic to wait for the queue to become empty is in a different tool. > Would it be worth consolidating both into the same tool? If you can convince me why we would want to filter out events on the event generation side instead of doing that on the event handling side. I'm not sure about the idea of controlling the module load order or the other weird things that way, but you may may have good reasons I don't see at the moment. Kay ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel