From: Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@easyconnect.fr>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: net interface renaming issue (+fix?)
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 17:21:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060409192140.73644723@eusebe> (raw)
Hi,
I'm running Gentoo Linux, a 2.6.16-ck kernel, and udev-0.89-r2, and
have had hard time with network interfaces renaming through udev
rules. The first thing i've tried were rules like this one:
SUBSYSTEM="net", KERNEL="eth*", SYSFS{address}="00:0d:60:12:75:0a", NAME="lan"
Plus this one from the standard early rules:
ACTION="add", SUBSYSTEM="net", WAIT_FOR_SYSFS="address"
It doesn't work when i "modprobe e1000" (my ethernet driver):
...
udevd[21612]: udev_event_run: seq 956 forked, pid [21816], 'add' 'net', 0 seconds old
udevd-event[21816]: wait_for_sysfs: file '/sys/class/net/eth0/address' appeared after 0 loops
udevd-event[21816]: udev_rules_get_name: no node name set, will use kernel name 'eth0'
...
But if i later do a "echo add > /sys/class/net/eth0/uevent", then
interface is properly renamed. It also works fine if i start with
the module initialy not loaded, and then trigger the uevent on the
corresponding pci device (will load the module, etc.)
Then i've tried replacing the address match by DRIVER="e1000", with
no more success. But i've noticed something interesting in debug
output, when the rule matcher walks up in parent devices to check
the driver:
% grep -i driver /var/tmp/udev-net-debug.log
...
udevd-event[18411]: match_key: key DRIVER value='e1000'
udevd-event[18411]: match_key: match DRIVER 'e1000' <-> ''
udevd-event[18411]: match_key: DRIVER is false
udevd-event[18411]: sysfs_device_get: add to cache 'devpath=/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1e.0/0000:02:01.0', subsystem='pci', driver=''
udevd-event[18411]: match_key: key DRIVER value='e1000'
udevd-event[18411]: match_key: match DRIVER 'e1000' <-> ''
udevd-event[18411]: match_key: DRIVER is false
...
This is weird, because if i latter look in /sys, the "driver" links
are here. Which made me think it was a race, so i've added this rule:
ACTION="add", SUBSYSTEM="net", WAIT_FOR_SYSFS="device/driver"
And it fixed the problem:
...
udevd[21612]: udev_event_run: seq 950 forked, pid [21790], 'add' 'net', 0 seconds old
udevd-event[21790]: wait_for_sysfs: file '/sys/class/net/eth0/address' appeared after 0 loops
udevd-event[21790]: wait_for_sysfs: wait for '/sys/class/net/eth0/device/driver' for 20 mseconds
udevd-event[21790]: wait_for_sysfs: file '/sys/class/net/eth0/device/driver' appeared after 1 loops
udevd-event[21790]: udev_rules_get_name: rule applied, 'eth0' becomes 'lan'
udevd-event[21790]: rename_net_if: changing net interface name from 'eth0' to 'lan'
udevd-event[21790]: udev_add_device: renamed netif to 'lan'
...
It also fixes the problem with using a SYSFS{address} match btw.
With no such wait, i can see in debug that "address" is found in sysfs,
but with no value:
...
udevd-event[21977]: sysfs_attr_get_value: open '/class/net/eth0'/'address'
udevd-event[21977]: sysfs_attr_get_value: new uncached attribute '/sys/class/net/eth0/address'
udevd-event[21977]: sysfs_attr_get_value: add to cache '/sys/class/net/eth0/address'
udevd-event[21977]: sysfs_attr_get_value: open '/class/net/eth0'/'address'
...
Whereas with the wait-for-driver trick, i can see it read with a
useful value:
...
udevd-event[21954]: sysfs_attr_get_value: open '/class/net/eth0'/'address'
udevd-event[21954]: sysfs_attr_get_value: new uncached attribute '/sys/class/net/eth0/address'
udevd-event[21954]: sysfs_attr_get_value: add to cache '/sys/class/net/eth0/address'
udevd-event[21954]: sysfs_attr_get_value: cache '/sys/class/net/eth0/address' with value '00:0d:60:12:75:0a'
...
So i wonder, maybe such a rule should be added to the standard early
ones? It should maybe use more checks though, to be sure there is
actually a driver to wait. Something like ENV{PHYSDEVPATH}="?*"
and/or ENV{PHYSDEVDRIVER}="?*".
Btw, using ENV{PHYSDEVDRIVER}="e1000" in my renaming rule was working
fine, with no trick (this variables are correctly set, like 'udevmonitor
--env' shows).
So, what do you think, does such a rule makes sense?
Or is "address" being added to sysfs with no useful value yet the real
issue, and my rule only an ugly workround?
Thanks,
--
TGL.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid\x110944&bid$1720&dat\x121642
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next reply other threads:[~2006-04-09 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-09 17:21 Thomas de Grenier de Latour [this message]
2006-04-09 17:56 ` net interface renaming issue (+fix?) Sergey Vlasov
2006-04-09 18:00 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2006-04-09 19:28 ` Thomas de Grenier de Latour
2006-04-13 8:39 ` Marco d'Itri
2006-04-13 9:06 ` Thomas de Grenier de Latour
2006-04-13 10:29 ` Kay Sievers
2006-04-13 10:36 ` Marco d'Itri
2006-04-13 11:10 ` Kay Sievers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060409192140.73644723@eusebe \
--to=degrenier@easyconnect.fr \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).