From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
"Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@ums.usu.ru>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, version 9
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 22:46:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060625224631.GD1608@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1151270127.3617.26.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 04:15:26PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> Actually, the first problem is that SCSI doesn't compile as a module at
> all: late_initcalls are defined to be module_init calls for modules.
> Your adding this to scsi_scan.c now gives us two module_init calls,
> which won't build. I fixed this by putting an #ifdef MODULE around the
> late_initcall.
I think that's a good idea (well, I would, I suggested it to you ;-)
> > There's a potential solution to this. If we add a hook to sys_module_init
> > such that it'll call a specified function before returning, we can make
> > it wait until all scans are done. This way, userspace never sees the
> > asynchronous scanning behaviour. But if you have devices of different
> > types, you won't get the overlapping scans.
>
> How about this solution which works for me with debian on a huge 6 bus
> scsi machine: it introduces a new module scsi_wait_scan.ko whose sole
> job is to wait for the scans to complete in its init function. The
> initrd/initramfs sequence now becomes:
>
> insert all other modules
> modprobe scsi_wait_scan
I think that's a great idea. I wonder about making it always fail
initialisation, since then it can be loaded multiple times without being
unloaded. I think Arjan was suggesting some proc or sysfs file that
would cause scsi_complete_async_scans() to be called, but I couldn't
figure out where a good place to put such a file would be.
> @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI) += scsi_mod.o
>
> +ifeq ("$(CONFIG_SCSI)", "m")
> + obj-m += scsi_wait_scan.o
> +endif
We seem to have a bit of an allergy to conditionals in Makefiles these
days; how about:
tmp-$(CONFIG_SCSI) := scsi_wait_scan.o
obj-m += $(tmp-m)
>
> -static int scsi_complete_async_scans(void)
> +int scsi_complete_async_scans(void)
> {
> struct async_scan_data *data;
>
> @@ -157,8 +157,10 @@
> kfree(data);
> return 0;
> }
Do you think it's worth putting in something like:
/* Only exported for the benefit of scsi_wait_scan */
And maybe ...
#ifdef MODULE
/* Only exported for the benefit of scsi_wait_scan */
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scsi_complete_async_scans);
#else
late_initcall(scsi_complete_async_scans);
#endif
I really don't want to see driver authors calling it -- if they are,
something's gone pretty horribly wrong.
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid\x120709&bid&3057&dat\x121642
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-25 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060511143352.GI12272@parisc-linux.org>
[not found] ` <20060518172258.GL1604@parisc-linux.org>
[not found] ` <20060529031915.GB23405@parisc-linux.org>
[not found] ` <447AB2F5.2000700@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
[not found] ` <20060529130515.GE23405@parisc-linux.org>
2006-05-31 23:21 ` Asynchronous scsi scanning, version 9 Patrick Mansfield
2006-06-01 12:22 ` Kay Sievers
2006-10-26 19:53 ` maximilian attems
2006-06-01 13:14 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2006-06-01 13:21 ` maximilian attems
2006-06-01 13:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-06-01 13:26 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2006-06-01 14:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-25 21:15 ` James Bottomley
2006-06-25 22:46 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2006-06-26 8:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-26 12:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-06-26 12:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-26 16:03 ` Greg KH
2006-06-26 14:44 ` Matthew Dharm
2006-06-26 15:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-06-26 15:44 ` James Bottomley
2006-06-26 16:02 ` Greg KH
2006-06-26 21:08 ` Matthew Dharm
2006-06-26 22:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-06-26 18:55 ` [SPAM] " Doug Ledford
2006-06-26 21:04 ` Matthew Dharm
2006-06-26 21:20 ` Doug Ledford
2006-06-26 20:58 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-06-26 21:14 ` James Bottomley
2006-06-26 21:21 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-06-26 21:41 ` James Bottomley
2006-06-28 7:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
2006-06-28 16:03 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060625224631.GD1608@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
--cc=patrakov@ums.usu.ru \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).