From: Matthias Schwarzott <zzam@gentoo.org>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Excluding some device types from persistent-net (xen, s390)
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:22:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704121522.05069.zzam@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704120944.10520.zzam@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2031 bytes --]
On Donnerstag, 12. April 2007, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 12:33 +0200, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> > On Donnerstag, 12. April 2007, you wrote:
> > > On 4/12/07, Matthias Schwarzott <zzam@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > > I have a change to persistent-net behaviour, to exclude xen-devices,
> > > > and s390-devices.
> > >
> > > It's not needed, or does not work for xen and s390?
> >
> > xen creates random macs per default I think. And s390 does create macs on
> > login or similar? Perhaps someone really using a s390 could comment on
> > this.
> >
>
> > or does
> > SUBSYSTEMS=="xen|ccwgroup", GOTO="persistent_net_end"
> > or
>
> That should work too, only the != has the weird behavior.
>
Updated patch with this variant attached.
Now we can discuss if the rules itself are usfull.
1. xen:
I think for xen the persistence framework itself is not usefull, as the order
of the devices is every time the same, isn't it. The only known problem is
caused by the rules itself: When mac is randomly assigned udev counts up
xen[0-9].
2. s390 / ccwgroup
I have no such machine, but I have this request to re-add (the for s390
completely removed persistence-net):
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173797
Cornelia Huck <huckc@de.ibm.com> (IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH) wrote:
> There are a few cases where the mac address can be zero (some VM Guest
> Lan, iirc), and some ccwgroup devices don't have a mac address (keep in
> mind that ccwgroup is just the bus; devices can be fundamentally
> different, like qeth and ctc). But these cases should be handled well
> during persistent rule generation.
>
> Also, not all s390 network devices are on the ccwgroup bus; however
> netiucv device are already excluded since they use iucv* and don't have
> mac addresses anyway.
that is part of the used rules: apply persistence only on this condition:
KERNEL=="eth*|ath*|wlan*|ra*|sta*"
That means qeth and ctc (if that is the device name) should already be
ignored.
Matthias
--
Matthias Schwarzott (zzam)
[-- Attachment #2: udev-108-persistent-net-excludes.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1062 bytes --]
diff --git a/extras/rule_generator/75-persistent-net-generator.rules b/extras/rule_generator/75-persistent-net-generator.rules
index 21eb0c6..eeef4d1 100644
--- a/extras/rule_generator/75-persistent-net-generator.rules
+++ b/extras/rule_generator/75-persistent-net-generator.rules
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
# these rules generate rules for persistent network device naming
+SUBSYSTEMS=="xen|ccwgroup", GOTO="persistent_net_generator_end"
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", KERNEL=="eth*|ath*|wlan*|ra*|sta*" \
NAME!="?*", DRIVERS=="?*", GOTO="persistent_net_generator_do"
@@ -10,7 +11,6 @@ LABEL="persistent_net_generator_do"
SUBSYSTEMS=="pci", ENV{COMMENT}="PCI device $attr{vendor}:$attr{device} ($attr{driver})"
SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ENV{COMMENT}="USB device 0x$attr{idVendor}:0x$attr{idProduct} ($attr{driver})"
SUBSYSTEMS=="ieee1394", ENV{COMMENT}="Firewire device $attr{host_id})"
-SUBSYSTEMS=="xen", ENV{COMMENT}="Xen virtual device"
ENV{COMMENT}=="", ENV{COMMENT}="$env{SUBSYSTEM} device ($attr{driver})"
IMPORT{program}="write_net_rules $attr{address}"
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 226 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-12 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-12 7:44 Excluding some device types from persistent-net (xen, s390) Matthias Schwarzott
2007-04-12 10:14 ` Kay Sievers
2007-04-12 10:33 ` Matthias Schwarzott
2007-04-12 11:33 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-12 12:30 ` Kay Sievers
2007-04-12 13:22 ` Matthias Schwarzott [this message]
2007-04-12 13:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-12 14:12 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-04-13 14:44 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-13 14:51 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-04-13 15:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-13 20:08 ` Matthias Schwarzott
2007-04-14 11:46 ` Matthias Schwarzott
2007-04-14 12:35 ` Matthias Schwarzott
2007-04-16 8:16 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-18 21:00 ` Matthias Schwarzott
2007-04-20 11:27 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-21 13:35 ` Matthias Schwarzott
2007-04-23 9:03 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200704121522.05069.zzam@gentoo.org \
--to=zzam@gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).