From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:24:11 +0000 Subject: Re: FYI: /lib/udev/rules.d/ /etc/udev/rules.d/ and duplicated Message-Id: <20080809152411.GB16448@bongo.bofh.it> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX" List-Id: References: <1218284497.31266.46.camel@lgn.site> In-Reply-To: <1218284497.31266.46.camel@lgn.site> To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Aug 09, Kay Sievers wrote: > The files in ???/etc/udev/rules/ (and /dev/.udev/rules.d/) have precedence > over files in /lib/udev/rules.d/. This allows the custom system config in > /etc to overwrite whole rules files of the default rules. If empty files > are created, udev will completely ignore the default rules files with > the same name. This looks like another case of "my packaging system sucks at managing configuration files"... --=20 ciao, Marco --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkidtpsACgkQFGfw2OHuP7GnogCfWxmri8TEB72QuRFbO6mH6blM Ty8AniUrieupzK9CvM6xjc57U6V2+QbM =RhwT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX--