From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:54:13 +0000 Subject: Re: default udev rules Message-Id: <20080811165413.GA12759@bongo.bofh.it> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT" List-Id: References: <1218277281.31266.32.camel@lgn.site> In-Reply-To: <1218277281.31266.32.camel@lgn.site> To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Aug 11, Kay Sievers wrote: > > Why not split 50-udev-default.rules in 50-udev-default.rules and > > 50-udev-permissions.rules? We continue with a default and shared > > set of rules and a separated "permissions" file. > It's technically not really needed, or can be easily fixed otherwise if > needed, but if that's what people prefer, I don't really mind doing > that. 50-udev-permissions.rules does not work because it needs ENV{ID_CLASS} for joystick devices and ENV{ID_CDROM}, I used 91. --=20 ciao, Marco --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkigbrUACgkQFGfw2OHuP7H4VgCcCFTvHwzvWUoOkS8MIYslP+JV yDMAn2bVLR0gVCs4EcTlUVaIQV40uhFw =I+pE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT--