From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:50:53 +0000 Subject: Re: Patches for device names Message-Id: <20080813175053.GB30052@kroah.com> List-Id: References: <1218648175.6882.63.camel@quest> In-Reply-To: <1218648175.6882.63.camel@quest> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 06:22:55PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > Before I get patching, I wanted to get a consensus about what the best > patches would be, since there's a few options: Wait, why do this at all? To get rid of a few udev rules that group things into subdirectories? Is that really a sane/wise/useful thing to do? Is your goal to get rid of _all_ udev rules by doing this? If not, then why worry about it? thanks, greg k-h