From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:14:48 +0000 Subject: Re: Network Device Naming mechanism and policy Message-Id: <20090324231448.GA21479@kroah.com> List-Id: References: <20090324154617.GA16332@auslistsprd01.us.dell.com> <49C9087C.5070907@trash.net> <1237912858.9082.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090324210214.7ae65c06@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20090324210214.7ae65c06@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Alan Cox Cc: david@lang.hm, Dan Williams , Patrick McHardy , Matt Domsch , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:02:14PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > this is convienient for some things, but not for others. > > > > what's unique and reproducable is the discovery order > > Not in the case of things like USB... Or even PCI. /me pats his laptop that reassigns PCI device ids randomly every 3rd or so boot.