linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: David Zeuthen <david@fubar.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
	linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device idle
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:29:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091120202909.GA31117@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac3eb2510911190700o6f4e80cm172c14dc0f28451d@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:00:46PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:

> Yeah, it would not be as simple as your patch. It probably involves a
> way to get a file descriptor per listener, to let the kernel know if
> anybody is interested, and to auto-cleanup when the listener dies, and
> to have per instance timers.

This would seem to involve a lot of extra locking in the block 
submission and completion code. I don't think it's ideal. How about 
this:

* idle_hysteresis contains a value. If it's greater than 0, attempting 
to increase it will give -EINVAL. It can be polled.

* On idle state transition, applications listening to the stat sysfs 
node will get woken. The stat output will include the number of msecs 
that the disk has been idle. If this is less than the application 
requested, it can set a timer to wake it up again in the future and 
recheck.

* When an application exits, if (and only if) it wrote a value to 
idle_hysteresis, it should set this back to 0. This will notify any 
other apps, which may then set their own wakeup time.

It's not beautiful but it satisfies the constraints. There's a minimum 
of extra wakeups, it doesn't complicate the block path any further and 
multiple applications can take advantage of it.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-20 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-17 14:37 [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device idle changes Matthew Garrett
2009-11-17 15:55 ` [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device idle Kay Sievers
2009-11-17 16:09   ` David Zeuthen
2009-11-17 18:57     ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 19:30       ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 19:40         ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 19:47           ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 19:53             ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 20:03               ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 20:07                 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 21:06                   ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 21:29                     ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 21:35                       ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 21:39                         ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 21:45                           ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 21:33                     ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 21:40                       ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-19 11:09                       ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-19 13:01                         ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-19 13:29                           ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-19 14:16                             ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-19 14:25                               ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-19 14:30                                 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-19 14:34                                   ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-19 14:48                                     ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-19 15:00                                       ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-20 20:29                                         ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2009-11-22 23:37                   ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-23 14:12                     ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-23 14:17                     ` Jens Axboe
2009-11-23 14:25                       ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-23 14:31                         ` Jens Axboe
2009-11-23 14:42                           ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-23 19:50                             ` Jens Axboe
2009-11-23 19:54                               ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 22:10 ` [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device idle changes Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091120202909.GA31117@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=david@fubar.dk \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).