linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	David Zeuthen <david@fubar.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device idle
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:17:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091123141754.GE8742@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091122233749.GA9699@ucw.cz>

On Mon, Nov 23 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2009-11-18 20:07:12, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:03:21PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > 
> > > Sure, but what's wrong with reading that file every 50 seconds? Almost
> > > all boxes poll for media changes of optical drives and usb card
> > > readers anyway, so it's not that we are not doing stuff like this
> > > already.
> > 
> > We poll for media because there's no event-based way of avoiding it - in 
> > this case there is.
> 
> ...when you add overhead to every disk operation. I'd say that polling
> once in 50 seconds is preferable to that.

I have to agree, doing a mod_timer() on every single IO is going to suck
big time. I went to great lengths to avoid doing that even for timeout
detection. So that's pretty much a non-starter to begin with.

Additionally, as Bart also wrote, you are not doing this in the right
place. You want to do this post-merge, not for each incoming IO. Have
you looked at laptop mode? Looks like you are essentially re-inventing
that, but in a bad way.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-23 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-17 14:37 [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device idle changes Matthew Garrett
2009-11-17 15:55 ` [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device idle Kay Sievers
2009-11-17 16:09   ` David Zeuthen
2009-11-17 18:57     ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 19:30       ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 19:40         ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 19:47           ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 19:53             ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 20:03               ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 20:07                 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 21:06                   ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 21:29                     ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 21:35                       ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 21:39                         ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 21:45                           ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 21:33                     ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 21:40                       ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-19 11:09                       ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-19 13:01                         ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-19 13:29                           ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-19 14:16                             ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-19 14:25                               ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-19 14:30                                 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-19 14:34                                   ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-19 14:48                                     ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-19 15:00                                       ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-20 20:29                                         ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-22 23:37                   ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-23 14:12                     ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-23 14:17                     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-11-23 14:25                       ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-23 14:31                         ` Jens Axboe
2009-11-23 14:42                           ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-23 19:50                             ` Jens Axboe
2009-11-23 19:54                               ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 22:10 ` [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device idle changes Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091123141754.GE8742@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fubar.dk \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).