From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Martin Pitt <martin.pitt@ubuntu.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:22:56 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use utime rather than utimes
Message-Id: <20100310092256.GB2112@piware.de>
List-Id: <linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1268195770-20935-1-git-send-email-jon@ringle.org>
In-Reply-To: <1268195770-20935-1-git-send-email-jon@ringle.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org

Kay Sievers [2010-03-10  9:34 +0100]:
> utime(): POSIX.1-2008 marks utime() as obsolete. 

That's actually what the manpage says, indeed. However, it contradicts
what's written in the standard:

  http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/sys/time.h.html#tag_13_64

says utimes() is obsolete and

  http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/utime.h.html#tag_13_81

says nothing about being obsolete. However, this might not be _the_
POSIX standard?

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)