From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:48:40 +0000 Subject: Re: Use GROUP= in a rule matching an interface of the device? Message-Id: <20100913124840.GA14732@bongo.bofh.it> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Sep 13, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > My 50-udev-default-rules files does not use usb_id (file attached). > But other files in /lib/udev/rules.d/ do. The first one is > 60-persistent-alsa.rules Debian applies the permissions at 91, so your file needs to sort after 91-permissions.rules. This is documented in README.Debian. Kay, if rules files can depend of usb_id being ran at a certain point instead of running it themselves like the standard rules files currently do then you should say so... -- ciao, Marco