From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frederic Weisbecker Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:11:06 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] tracing, perf : add cpu hotplug trace events Message-Id: <20110120161101.GA17218@nowhere> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Vincent Guittot Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, amit.kucheria@linaro.org On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 09:25:54AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Please find below a new proposal for adding trace events for cpu hotplug. > The goal is to measure the latency of each part (kernel, architecture) > and also to trace the cpu hotplug activity with other power events. I > have tested these traces events on an arm platform. > > Changes since previous version: > -Use cpu_hotplug for trace name > -Define traces for kernel core and arch parts only > -Use DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS and DEFINE_EVENT > -Use proper indentation > > Subject: [PATCH] cpu hotplug tracepoint > > this patch adds new events for cpu hotplug tracing > * plug/unplug sequence > * core and architecture latency measurements > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot > --- > include/trace/events/cpu_hotplug.h | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Note we can't apply new tracepoints if they are not inserted in the code. > +DEFINE_EVENT(cpu_hotplug, cpu_hotplug_arch_wait_die_start, > + > + TP_PROTO(unsigned int cpuid), > + > + TP_ARGS(cpuid) > +); > + > +DEFINE_EVENT(cpu_hotplug, cpu_hotplug_arch_wait_die_end, > + > + TP_PROTO(unsigned int cpuid), > + > + TP_ARGS(cpuid) > +); What is wait die, compared to die for example? We need those tracepoints to be applied to get that reviewable in practice. Thanks.