From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 09:56:35 +0000 Subject: Re: udev regression from 167 to 168 on notion ink adam Message-Id: <20110505095635.GC12043@bongo.bofh.it> List-Id: References: <809580245.144501.1304521074555.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb069> In-Reply-To: <809580245.144501.1304521074555.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb069> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On May 05, Kay Sievers wrote: > Ah, no counted wrong, missed that there are 5 arguments. The 4th > argument, the 0x80000 is the SOCK_CLOEXEC. So it looks like your > kernel does not support accept4. Is that really a 2.6.32 kernel? Probably it is a libc bug, hppa had the same problem: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?buga7967 Johannes, can you confirm that the newer libc package works so I can add the appropriate conflicts when it will be in unstable? Still, udev should just explode if a syscall fails with ENOSYS. -- ciao, Marco