From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:41:49 +0000
Subject: advice needed for gentoo bug involving lvm2/udev
Message-Id: <20111003164149.GA13439@linux1>
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="SUOF0GtieIMvvwua"
List-Id: <linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org


--SUOF0GtieIMvvwua
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

All,

we have the following bug posted in gentoo's bugzilla:

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365227.

The reporter is telling me that we should use --action=change instead of
--action=add in the cold boot sequence when dev is devtmpfs. However,
this doesn't seem to be the correct fix based on earlier discussions on
this list.

Does anyone else have any suggestions for fixing this? My thought is
that the rules for lvm2 should be fixed. What does everyone else think?

William


--SUOF0GtieIMvvwua
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk6J5c0ACgkQblQW9DDEZTgHPACdHKuKnuFl4RsI16Ejb3Q8hGMu
1FQAoKBrrLJQZadWfVuLi5zmSlLQ1foY
=L25h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SUOF0GtieIMvvwua--