From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux hotplug mailing <linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Possible deadlock related to CPU hotplug and kernfs
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:14:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150902161445.GI22326@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55E54FE2.7030601@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:12:34PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Hi Rafael and Tejun,
> When running CPU hotplug tests, it triggers an lockdep warning
> as follow. The two possible deadlock paths are:
> 1) echo x > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpux/online
> ->kernfs_fop_write()
> ->kernfs_get_active()
> 1.a) ->rwsem_acquire_read(&kn->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
> ->cpu_up()
> 1.b) ->cpu_hotplug_begin()[lock_map_acquire(&cpu_hotplug.dep_map)]
> 2) hardware triggers hotplug evetns
> ->acpi_device_hotplug()
> ->acpi_processor_remove()
> 2.a) ->cpu_hotplug_begin()[lock_map_acquire(&cpu_hotplug.dep_map)]
> ->unregister_cpu()
> ->device_del()
> ->kernfs_remove_by_name_ns()
> ->__kernfs_remove()
> ->kernfs_drain()
> 2.b) ->rwsem_acquire(&kn->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_)
>
> So there is a possible deadlock scenario among 1.a, 1.b, 2.a and 2.b.
> I'm not familiar with kernfs, so could you please help to comment:
> 1) whether is a real deadlock issue?
Yes, it seems to be. It's highly unlikely but still possible.
> 2) any recommended way to get it fixed?
This usually happens with "delete" files and it's worked around by
performing special self-removal on the file before actually removing
the device. I suppose on/offline files would need to turn off
active_protection with kernfs_[un]break_active_protection() which
should probably grow sysfs and device layer wrappers.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-02 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-01 7:12 Possible deadlock related to CPU hotplug and kernfs Jiang Liu
2015-09-02 16:14 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2015-09-03 0:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-03 16:19 ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-03 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-04 7:20 ` Jiang Liu
2015-09-04 14:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-07 3:11 ` Jiang Liu
2015-09-07 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-08 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-08 22:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150902161445.GI22326@mtj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).