From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
linux hotplug mailing <linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Possible deadlock related to CPU hotplug and kernfs
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:19:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150903161904.GC10394@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12669324.bPBpI0mOPP@vostro.rjw.lan>
Hello, Rafael.
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 02:58:16AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> So acpi_device_hotplug() calls lock_device_hotplug() which simply
> acquires device_hotplug_lock. It is held throughout the entire
> hot-add/hot-remove code path.
>
> Witing anything to /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpux/online goes through
> online_store() in drivers/base/core.c and that does
> lock_device_hotplug_sysfs() which then attempts to acquire
> device_hotplug_lock using mutex_trylock(). And it only calls
> either device_online() or device_offline() if it ends up with the
> lock held.
>
> Quite frankly, I don't see how these particular two code paths can
> deadlock in any way.
>
> So either a third code path is involved which is not executed
> under device_hotplug_lock, or lockdep needs to be told to actually
> take device_hotplug_lock into account in this case IMO.
Hmm... all sysfs rw functions are protected from removal. ie. by
default, removal of a sysfs file drains in-flight rw operations, so
the hot plug path grabs a lock and then tries to remove a file and
writing to the online file makes the file's write method to try to
grab the same lock. It deadlocks if the hotunplug path already has
the lock and trying to drain the online file for removal.
The same problem exists for "delete" files but that's already handled
from device core side.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-03 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-01 7:12 Possible deadlock related to CPU hotplug and kernfs Jiang Liu
2015-09-02 16:14 ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-03 0:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-03 16:19 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2015-09-03 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-04 7:20 ` Jiang Liu
2015-09-04 14:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-07 3:11 ` Jiang Liu
2015-09-07 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-08 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-08 22:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150903161904.GC10394@mtj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).