From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Johannes Schauer" Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 11:32:26 +0000 Subject: Re: udev regression from 167 to 168 on notion ink adam Message-Id: <279147876.424506.1304595146993.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb067> List-Id: References: <809580245.144501.1304521074555.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb069> In-Reply-To: <809580245.144501.1304521074555.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb069> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org Hi Marco, >On May 05, Kay Sievers wrote: > >> Ah, no counted wrong, missed that there are 5 arguments. The 4th >> argument, the 0x80000 is the SOCK_CLOEXEC. So it looks like your >> kernel does not support accept4. Is that really a 2.6.32 kernel? >Probably it is a libc bug, hppa had the same problem: > >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?buga7967 > >Johannes, can you confirm that the newer libc package works so I can add >the appropriate conflicts when it will be in unstable? I installed libc6_2.13-0exp5 and libc-bin_2.13-0exp5 from the experimental repositories but the problem was still the same. thank you for your help josch