From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kay Sievers" Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:26:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fixed installation path for 64-bit libvolume_id.so Message-Id: <3ae72650807091426w3ea5f34an2810c679da1d1fae@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: References: <1215468723-18298-2-git-send-email-thomas@koeller.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <1215468723-18298-2-git-send-email-thomas@koeller.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 08:53, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Thomas Koeller wrote: >> >> Installing 64-bit libraries in /lib and /usr/lib >> is wrong. >> > > Fedora has the attached patch and builds on 64bit systems with: > $ make libdir="/lib64" usrlibdir="/usr/lib64" ... This is not needed, it works fine without the patch. We all do it that way for long. > diff -up udev-120/extras/volume_id/lib/Makefile.lib64 > udev-120/extras/volume_id/lib/Makefile > + $(INSTALL_LIB) -D libvolume_id.a What would be the point to package an intermediate internal udev build file?. This is not a library, and nothing that should be distributed with a package. Thanks, Kay