From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sandro Latini Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 20:37:15 +0000 Subject: Strange parport detection Message-Id: <4286617B.8070000@tiscali.it> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org Hi, i'm using a LFS linux with udev version 0.57. All works fine except for the parport device that is not correctly rappresented in /dev. I have just looked in dmesg for the right assignament of the parallel port and all seems fine. In sysfs there is a "parport0" too. Then i have looked udev rules file and found this: "KERNEL="parport[0-9]*", NAME="%k", GROUP="lp" This is the standard file of LFS udev rules and searching around with google i have seen that it's widley used. Is it right? Or is a bug? Because i have tried to change the string above with this: KERNEL="parport0", NAME="%k", GROUP="lp" matching completly the name of the port.. and it's a mistake but parport0 dev node is now in /dev! This is my dmesg when parport is loaded: pnp: the driver 'parport_pc' has been registered pnp: match found with the PnP device '00:07' and the driver 'parport_pc' parport: PnPBIOS parport detected. parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778), irq 7, dma 3 [PCSPP,TRISTATE,COMPAT,EPP,ECP,DMA] Thanks in advance for any support or fix :) Sandro Latini ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ids93&alloc_id281&op=click _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel