From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: new release of udev?
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 06:52:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42917D93.9010800@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050519065848.GA25640@kroah.com>
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 22, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote:
>
>>It was _you_ who asked to be able to overwrite the system specified rules
>>for symlinks. That's not possible this way. And again, how do you prevent
> Sure it is: if you want to override any previous value you use SYMLINK> instead of the usual SYMLINK+=.
>
No. Definitely not.
This would break _every_ rule file out there as the current
specification for SYMLINK= is 'add to the existing SYMLINK'.
The semantics _have_ to stay the same. If you want different
funtionality, use different symbols.
Otherwise you end up in maintenance hell.
But you are correct in one point, that is that the 'reset symlinks list'
functionality is not provided.
So I propose a new type of assignment,
SYMLINK%
which resets the list and add the argument as the first element in that
list.
Then we'll have:
SYMLINK%= (reset and add to list)
SYMLINK= (add to list)
SYMLINK:= (add and terminate list)
which make for a full set of modifications.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke hare@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG S390 & zSeries
Maxfeldstraße 5 +49 911 74053 688
90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt12&alloc_id\x16344&opÃk
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-23 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-19 6:58 new release of udev? Greg KH
2005-05-19 7:30 ` Kay Sievers
2005-05-19 7:55 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 10:32 ` Marco d'Itri
2005-05-19 14:12 ` Kay Sievers
2005-05-19 16:09 ` Marco d'Itri
2005-05-19 17:49 ` Darren Salt
2005-05-19 21:02 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 21:24 ` Darren Salt
2005-05-19 22:31 ` Kay Sievers
2005-05-22 0:59 ` Marco d'Itri
2005-05-22 1:09 ` Kay Sievers
2005-05-22 12:01 ` Marco d'Itri
2005-05-22 12:42 ` Kay Sievers
2005-05-22 12:55 ` Marco d'Itri
2005-05-22 13:00 ` Kay Sievers
2005-05-22 13:07 ` Marco d'Itri
2005-05-22 17:38 ` Kay Sievers
2005-05-23 6:52 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2005-05-23 7:34 ` Marco d'Itri
2005-05-23 9:43 ` Marco d'Itri
2005-06-20 18:10 ` Marco d'Itri
2005-06-20 20:40 ` Kay Sievers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42917D93.9010800@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).