From: Miles Roper <mroper@xtra.co.nz>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Thinstation-developer] Re: udev PROGRAM action
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:03:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <430DB3A3.6090001@xtra.co.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <430C3C87.4080209@xtra.co.nz>
Thanks Kay & Others for all your help :o)
Cheers
Miles
Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:53:05PM +1200, Miles Roper wrote:
>
>>I've noticed that there is a devfs udev rules file, but it says not to use
>>it as devfs compatibalty isn't really the way to go. I've also noticed
>>mandrake & others all seem to use it.
>
>
> SUSE an Red Hat never used it and never will. Gentoo is on the way
> getting rid of it (half way done). I can't speak for others, but be sure
> that this scheme was already dead before it hit the kernel.
>
>
>>Is there a standard defined
>>somewhere which lists what device name/symlinks you should use for likes of
>>ide devices & others?
>
>
> Yes, the LSB names, which are mostly the kernel names. For some
> subsystems there is s subdirectory for the nodes to live in.
>
> Enumerating devices like the devfs approach is a silly idea in a world
> where device come and go at any time. It just doesn't make _any_ sense
> to give a disk a number depending on the order of recognition.
>
> For persistent disk naming, Hannes Reinecke specified a scheme for
> SUSE, which can solve many problems in that area. SUSE uses this scheme
> and udev tools also in initramfs for a while. The recent udev has a new
> infrastructure with the IMPORT key to make stuff like this very easy.
> It also makes the crappy mount-by-label code obsolete. We've had a BOF at
> OLS this year and everybody agreed that we want to go this way. See here:
> http://www.kroah.com/log/2005/08/18/#2005_08_18-persistent
>
> Everything needed is in the udev tarball. If any other subsystems has a
> reqirement of stable device names, just some small binaries or scripts and a
> bunch of IMPORT udev rules wold be needed to maintain persistent names
> in /dev.
>
>
>>Either I try to get the devfs script file working,
>>or recode several different scripts. Both is about the same amount of work
>>as the script doesn't work on busybox ash.
>>
>>Also, I don't want to have to recode things again later on so are trying to
>>work out the best way to do it now.
>
>
> I suggest looking at the /dev/disk/* rules and start from there to
> improve and extend this scheme and let the devfs stuff finally rest
> in peace.
>
> Thanks,
> Kay
>
>
>
>>Kay Sievers wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:47:47AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Miles Roper (mroper@xtra.co.nz) said:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Thanks very much for your help so far. Its starting to make sense :o)
>>>>>
>>>>>I still can't get the below rule to work :o(
>>>>>
>>>>>KERNEL="sd*", ACTION="add", BUS="usb", RUN=+"/etc/udev/scripts/usb.sh"
>>>>>KERNEL="sd*", ACTION="remove", BUS="usb",
>>>>>RUN=+"/etc/udev/scripts/usb.sh"
>>>>>
>>>>>neither script gets run (as they create a test file in /tmp if they run)
>>>>>
>>>>>I can post info from syslog when the device is added if you want?
>>>>
>>>>sd* device names are on the SCSI bus, not the USB bus.
>>>
>>>That should match, cause udev will walk up the chain of devices in
>>>sysfs. Matching on SYSFS, DRIVER and BUS on any of the devices
>>>following the "device" link should work. (But all matches must be true on
>>>the same device directory, you can't match BUS and SYSFS from different
>>>devices at the same time. See "udevinfo -a -p /block/sda".)
>>>
>>>It's RUN+="...", not RUN=+"...". :)
>>>And you can't match on BUS with "remove" cause there is no bus anymore,
>>>while the device is removed. Only in the environment of the event you
>>>will find PHYSDEVBUS, cause the kernel knows that, but the sysfs
>>>directory is already gone. ENV{PHYSDEVBUS}="..." should work if really
>>>needed.
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-25 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-24 9:23 [Thinstation-developer] Re: udev PROGRAM action Miles Roper
2005-08-24 10:11 ` Kay Sievers
2005-08-24 10:17 ` Miles Roper
2005-08-24 10:39 ` Kay Sievers
2005-08-24 11:05 ` Miles Roper
2005-08-24 13:47 ` Bill Nottingham
2005-08-24 15:30 ` Christian Zoz
2005-08-24 19:06 ` Kay Sievers
2005-08-24 19:27 ` Thierry Vignaud
2005-08-25 10:53 ` Miles Roper
2005-08-25 11:55 ` Kay Sievers
2005-08-25 12:03 ` Miles Roper [this message]
2005-08-31 7:20 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=430DB3A3.6090001@xtra.co.nz \
--to=mroper@xtra.co.nz \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).