From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:08:55 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] threadsafe rules iteration
Message-Id: <48C14B87.5060406@tuffmail.co.uk>
List-Id: <linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org>
References: <48C113FC.3080203@tuffmail.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <48C113FC.3080203@tuffmail.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org

Alan Jenkins wrote:
> Move ->current out of struct udev_rules and into a new struct udev_rules_iter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
>
> diff --git a/udev/udev_rules.c b/udev/udev_rules.c
> index da7a62a..c21d762 100644
> --- a/udev/udev_rules.c
> +++ b/udev/udev_rules.c
>   

> @@ -1561,14 +1562,15 @@ int udev_rules_get_name(struct udev_rules *rules, struct udevice *udev)
>  
>  int udev_rules_get_run(struct udev_rules *rules, struct udevice *udev)
>  {
> +	struct udev_rules_iter *iter;
>   

Sorry, don't apply that.  It should be

	struct udev_rules_iter iter;


I think we should be building with -Werror, but I'm not sure how to tell
autoconf/automake.

udev_rules.c: In function ‘udev_rules_get_run’:
udev_rules.c:1571: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘udev_rules_iter_init’
from incompatible pointer type
udev_rules.c:1573: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘udev_rules_iter_next’
from incompatible pointer type
udev_rules.c:1624: warning: passing argument 1 of
‘udev_rules_iter_label’ from incompatible pointer type