Re: ntfs.c failure in udev128 (with lseek() in util.c:405)

Re: ntfs.c failure in udev128 (with lseek() in util.c:405)

[Scott Tester]

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id#7984 is more like my problem. 
I've included myself on it.  Bug 236635 deals with issues in udev127 and
gentoo specific hal rules (both of which I'm aware of.)

I'll resubmit this to linux-hotplug (via CC) as well.

Robby Workman wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:57:25 +1000
> Scott Tester <scott@smbc.com.au> wrote:
>
>   
>> I re-emerged udev -128 (I'm using gentoo) then re-emerged hal-0.5.11*.
>> Still no go.
>>
>> ntfs.c line 145 calls util.c which then seems to fail on an lseek( )
>> call on line 405 with strerror(errno)="Invalid Argument".
>> Yet the arguments are identical with udev127 - only they succeed.
>>
>>
>> *the actual gentoo ebuild is hal-0.5.11-r3. (which includes the
>> udevadm patch you mentioned.)
>>     
>
>
>
> See comment 26 in http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id#6635 -
> that's really not a solution, but it's worth seeing if it makes a
> difference on your system.  Either way, this probably *is* a bug in
> udev since the hal rebuild still doesn't work.  Whether you should file
> it on gentoo's bugzilla and/or send it back to the udev mail list is up
> to you - I'd probably do both. :-)
>
> -RW
>
>   


-- 

Scott Tester

IT Department

SMBC  www.smbc.com.au <http://www.smbc.com.au>

Sydney Missionary and Bible College

43 Badminton Road, Croydon NSW 2132

Phone: 02 9747 4780  ext 147

Mobile: 0411 145 584