From: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: replace in-memory rules array with match/action token list
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:16:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49008722.8060708@tuffmail.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4900419F.7010405@tuffmail.co.uk>
Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 13:34, Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Alan Jenkins wrote:
>>
>>>> The in-memory rule array of a common desktop distro install took:
>>>> 1151088 bytes
>>>> with the token list:
>>>> 109232 bytes tokens (6827 * 16 bytes), 71302 bytes buffer
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Sounds great from a performance point of view.
>>>
>>> It doesn't work for me though. My simulation takes over 5 times as
>>> long, and doesn't finish cleanly; i.e. there's still lots in
>>> /dev/.udev/queue after the cpu usage has stopped. I'll try to track it
>>> down.
>>>
>>>
>> Sorry - the queue is cleaned up correctly. I was just too impatient.
>>
>> It's not a perfect test; I'm comparing
>>
>> a391f49d7f5433e6204f35331b81391c2d110309 - good ..
>> b99028c96307e729303be8f6750418979a7488b9 - bad
>>
>> which includes a few more commits, though the match/action list is
>> obviously the biggest one.
>>
>> The bad version of udevd seems to be generating two extra uevents per
>> device, in addition to the ones generated by "udevadm trigger". That
>> is, the output of "udevadm monitor --kernel" is three times as long!
>>
>> It's not a change in udevmonitor or udevtrigger; I'm still using the
>> Ubuntu installed version of udevadm for testing. I really don't
>> understand how this could happen. Do you have any idea?
>>
>
> Hmm, I don't see that here. Any rules you have, which may trigger
> uevents, and which may behave differently now?
> grep uevent /etc/udev/rules.d/* /lib/udev/rules.d/* /dev/.udev/rules.d/*
>
> Kay
>
Nope.
Drat, I can't reproduce that any more. It's still takes over five times
as long, but I can't see anything unexpected happening.
I tried using strace (piped through grep 'open.*uevent".*WR'). At that
point it seemed to stop happening, even when I rebooted and ran it
without strace.
All I can think is, I must have accidentally run "udevadm trigger" twice
before I started udevd.
Baaa
(sheepishly) Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-23 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-23 9:19 replace in-memory rules array with match/action token list Alan Jenkins
2008-10-23 11:34 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-10-23 12:47 ` Kay Sievers
2008-10-23 14:16 ` Alan Jenkins [this message]
2008-10-23 14:36 ` Kay Sievers
2008-10-23 16:10 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-10-23 19:09 ` Kay Sievers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49008722.8060708@tuffmail.co.uk \
--to=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).