Re: Moving Ubuntu to upstream udev rules

[Piter PUNK <piterpunk@unitednerds.org>]

Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 06:47 +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>>   additionally, we place these in the "audio" group
>>
>>     SUBSYSTEM="rtc", GROUP="audio"
> 
> Hmm, that sounds like a really weird workaround of some audio problem.
> Is this really what we want. :)

Only to know... why rtc in "audio" group?

>>     ramdisk -> ram0
>>     js* -> input/js*	- aren't these different kernel drivers?
> 
> I have no idea. Maybe remove them? Harald?

ramdisk -> ram0 --> link is on devices.txt
js -> input/js  --> probably is wrong. js and input/js are from
		    different drivers

>>     ftape -> qft0

devices.txt

>> permissions
>> 
>>   dri/card*	666	???!!!

I think this is overwrited by xorg.conf setting i don't have any
rule changing this permission and ther permissions here are 660:

crw-rw---- 1 root video 226, 0 2008-12-20 03:33 /dev/dri/card0

I guess 660 is the default of Xorg without an Mode directive
in DRI section in xorg.conf. The "video" group here is from
one of few slackware custom rules. (maybe another one that
can vanishes in the air?)

>>   tty		620	instead of 600? your ttys are writable?
> 
> No idea. Just change it?

good to use "wall" and "write".

>> groups
>
>>   no dialout group?	- this may be Debianish, but we rely on it
>>   nvram in group kmem not nvram?

Hmmmm... no dialout and no nvram group here.
nvram really needs an exclusive group?

> Thanks for doing this, lookingm forward to a more unified setup!

Closer and closer -:)

Piter PUNK