linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How does Linux handle PCI-E Surprise unplug?
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:41:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B7E3284.2070305@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8506939B503B404A84BBB12293FC45F606B883BA@emailbng3.jnpr.net>

(2010/02/19 13:01), Rajat Jain wrote:
> 
> It is fairly common for the drivers to have such code:
> 
> Val1 = ioread32(reg1);
> Val2 = ioread32(reg2);
> Val3 = ioread32(reg3);
> Val4 = ioread32(reg4);
> 
> Do you mean the above code is wrong and it should be re-written as:
> 
> If ((Val1 = ioread32(reg1)) = 0xFFFFFFFF)
> 	/* Abort */
> If ((Val2 = ioread32(reg2)) = 0xFFFFFFFF)
> 	/* Abort */
> Etc ....
> 
> Checking for 0xFFFFFFFF at every read is a pain, don't you think so?

... Dejavu?

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m\x108125011020312
  [RFC] readX_check() - Interface for PCI-X error recovery
  Date: 2004-04-06 11:04:49

> And
> more over, what is a register ACTUALLY contains the value 0xFFFFFFFF?
> How do we differentiate this with the case when the device has been
> plugged out?

An example I know is:
[arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h]
  static inline u8 eeh_readb(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
  {
	u8 val = in_8(addr);
	if (EEH_POSSIBLE_ERROR(val, u8))
		return eeh_check_failure(addr, val);
	return val;
  }

> 
> Finally, how do we re-write the following code to handle this correctly?
> 
> iowrite32(val1, reg1);
> iowrite32(val2, reg2);
> iowrite32(val3, reg3);
> iowrite32(val4, reg4);

One answer is as already posted by Greg, "read it."

If you made a request by writing some data, I think you will wait
a response from the device, with setting some reasonable timeout.
Soon in some form you will get a message like "success", "retry" or
"failed", or nothing if timeout.  Then you can report it to userland
and/or start next conversation with the device.


Thanks,
H.Seto


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-19  6:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-18  6:17 How does Linux handle PCI-E Surprise unplug? Rajat Jain
2010-02-18 14:52 ` Greg KH
2010-02-19  4:13 ` Rajat Jain
2010-02-19  4:27 ` Greg KH
2010-02-19  6:41 ` Hidetoshi Seto [this message]
2010-03-08  7:23 ` Rajat Jain
2010-03-08  8:24 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-03-08 22:49 ` Grant Grundler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B7E3284.2070305@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).