* Problem with udev-161 and isdn capi device nodes
@ 2010-08-16 20:19 Silvan Minghetti
2010-08-17 6:18 ` Kay Sievers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Silvan Minghetti @ 2010-08-16 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hotplug
Hi
I'm having a problem with udev >= 154, as it warns on NAME= values
different from the kernel provided names, as done per changeset
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=commitdiff;hucb1ac51ea0176926c749bd0f22c19ce8b20e5f
The problem is, with the following isdn capi rules (which were removed
from udev anyway), udev is not able to create the wanted devices,
because of a missing directory (/dev/capi), which has to be created
beforehand:
SUBSYSTEM="capi", KERNEL="capi", NAME="capi20", GROUP="dialout"
SUBSYSTEM="tty", KERNEL="capi[0-9]*", NAME="capi/%n"
so, instead of /dev/capi20 we now get /dev/capi
and /dev/capi0 instead of /dev/capi/0
Is this here to stay or is this going to be changed in the kernel? The
new layout breaks quite a few apps/libs...
silvan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Problem with udev-161 and isdn capi device nodes
2010-08-16 20:19 Problem with udev-161 and isdn capi device nodes Silvan Minghetti
@ 2010-08-17 6:18 ` Kay Sievers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kay Sievers @ 2010-08-17 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hotplug
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 22:19, Silvan Minghetti <bu1137@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm having a problem with udev >= 154, as it warns on NAME= values different
> from the kernel provided names, as done per changeset
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=commitdiff;hucb1ac51ea0176926c749bd0f22c19ce8b20e5f
>
> The problem is, with the following isdn capi rules (which were removed from
> udev anyway), udev is not able to create the wanted devices, because of a
> missing directory (/dev/capi), which has to be created beforehand:
>
> SUBSYSTEM="capi", KERNEL="capi", NAME="capi20", GROUP="dialout"
> SUBSYSTEM="tty", KERNEL="capi[0-9]*", NAME="capi/%n"
>
> so, instead of /dev/capi20 we now get /dev/capi
> and /dev/capi0 instead of /dev/capi/0
>
> Is this here to stay or is this going to be changed in the kernel? The new
> layout breaks quite a few apps/libs...
It needs to be changed in the kernel. It's rather trivial, but I don't
know if anybody is working on this at the moment. I guess people have
moved to mISDN, and that's why this hasn't really come up so far?
Kay
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-17 6:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-16 20:19 Problem with udev-161 and isdn capi device nodes Silvan Minghetti
2010-08-17 6:18 ` Kay Sievers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).