From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Smirl Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 21:53:33 +0000 Subject: Re: udev and sysfs permissions Message-Id: <9e47339105052014531d19ffe3@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: References: <9e47339105051915025188e535@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9e47339105051915025188e535@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On 5/20/05, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 05:40:05PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > > On 5/20/05, Greg KH wrote: > > > > That would make things simpler for driver writers if more devices a= re > > > > going to follow this model. > > > > > > I think you are going to be pretty unique here, as no one else has co= me > > > up with a situation yet that requires this. > > > > If the mantra about sysfs attributes being superior to IOCTLs is true, > > then anyone who converts to sysfs attributes is going to run into this > > problem. In the IOCTL model permission obviously follows the owner of > > the /dev device. There is no parallel for this in the sysfs model. >=20 > True. Hm, let me look into the sysfs code to see if we can just save > the changed attributes, so that they do not get lost. That would be the > simplest solution, right? That will work. Right now it is random for me from half an hour to four hours before they get lost. >=20 > thanks, >=20 > greg k-h >=20 --=20 Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt12&alloc_id=16344&op=CCk _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel