From: Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Milos Vyletel <milos.vyletel@sde.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: emit udev event when device is resized
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:04:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPXgP100NjPw4JVe39gL829MwKL2YLFSKN2fvaB7skbCub-Ehg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130225224339.GA19153@kroah.com>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:39:52PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hm, I thought we were frowning apon running binaries from udev rules
>> > these days, especially ones that might have big consequences (like
>> > resizing a disk image) like this.
>> >
>> > Kay, am I right?
>>
>> We removed most of them from the default setups, yes. But there is
>> nothing wrong if people want to ship that in some package or as custom
>> rules.
>>
>> It looks fine to me, we would just not add such things to the default
>> set of of rules these days.
>>
>> > We already emit KOBJECT_CHANGE events when block devices change, from
>> > within the block core code. Why is the patch below needed instead of
>> > using these events that are already generated? How are virtio block
>> > devices special?
>>
>> I think we only do that for dm and md and a couple of special cases
>> like loop and read-only settings.
>
> What about when we repartition a block device? I've seen the events
> happen then.
Right, from the common block code we send events for removable media
changes like cdroms, sd cards, when a device is switched to read-only,
and when we re-scan a partition table like on re-partitioning. Most of
the other events are block subsystem-specific like this one. For
things like device-mapper they are used pretty heavily.
> Anyway, if you are ok with this, no objection from my side then Rusty.
Looks fine to me, it should not do any harm if there are not heavy
programs hooked up -- which is nothing the kernel could fix if people
do that. :)
Kay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-25 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1361473348-7660-1-git-send-email-milos.vyletel@sde.cz>
[not found] ` <87y5ehfczy.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
2013-02-25 22:12 ` [PATCH] virtio-blk: emit udev event when device is resized Greg KH
2013-02-25 22:39 ` Kay Sievers
2013-02-25 22:43 ` Greg KH
2013-02-25 23:04 ` Kay Sievers [this message]
2013-02-25 23:38 ` Milos Vyletel
2013-02-25 23:41 ` Milos Vyletel
2013-02-27 0:46 ` Rusty Russell
2013-02-27 13:09 ` Milos Vyletel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPXgP100NjPw4JVe39gL829MwKL2YLFSKN2fvaB7skbCub-Ehg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kay@vrfy.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=milos.vyletel@sde.cz \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).