From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rob Pole" Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:18:10 +0000 Subject: RE: ADSL Card Drivers for Fedora Core 3 Message-Id: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org Update: I used the defined interface wp1ads1 in the rp-pppoe setup and had an autentication error from my ISP which means that settings are working. However when I corrected the password I then had the following log messages: (date), local host pppd[21529]: pppd 2.4.2 started by root, uid 0 (date), local host pppd[21529]: using interface ppp0 (date), local host pppd[21529]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/pts/4 (date), local host pppoe[21530]: PPP session is 42929 (date), local host pppoe[21530]: Session 42929 terminated -- received OADT from peer. I notice in the log when I do a wanrouter start: (date) localhost kernel: wanpipe1: configuring wp1adsl as Ethernet (date) localhost kernel: wait_for_sysfs[11438]: either wait_for_sysfs (udev 039) needs an update to handle the device '/class/net/wp1adsl' properly (no device symlink) or the sysfs-support of your device's driver needs to be fixed... -----Original Message----- From: Rob Pole [mailto:rob@genevation-it.com] Sent: 01 March 2005 12:18 To: James Scott Cc: techdesk@sangoma.com Subject: RE: ADSL Card Drivers for Fedora Core 3 Hi James, I have sorted out most of the problems, and have done a wanrouter start that looked to be successful. However I run into problems when I do an adsl-start. The log files are as follows: (date), local host pppd[21529]: pppd 2.4.2 started by root, uid 0 (date), local host pppd[21529]: using interface ppp0 (date), local host pppd[21529]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/pts/4 (date), local host pppoe[21530]: ioctl(STOCGIFHWADDR): Session 0: No such device The command adsl-status says Link is down -- could not find interface corresponding to pid 27554. I followed the instructions closely, the rp-pppoe adsl-setup script configuration instructions say to use the WANPIPE network interface as the Ethernet interface connected to a modem. I don't see this interface anywhere, could this be the problem? Thanks, Rob -----Original Message----- From: Rob Pole [mailto:rob@genevation-it.com] Sent: 01 March 2005 01:12 To: James Scott Subject: RE: ADSL Card Drivers for Fedora Core 3 James, I am new to Linux. Is there anything like an uninstall I need to do to the old wanpipe installation before I install the beta, or can I simply overwrite the existing installation? Rob -----Original Message----- From: James Scott [mailto:jscott@sangoma.com] Sent: 28 February 2005 23:45 To: Rob Pole Subject: Re: ADSL Card Drivers for Fedora Core 3 Hello, This warning that you get is correct. If you source name in the Makefile is one thing and the actual image is something else, we will warn you and give you the choice to build for the current image or the source name. If you want to use it on this system, then you should choose Yes. As for the i686, this is simply stating that you have a PIII or higher. It has nothing to do with 32 or 64bit. Please move to the beta version of the software as this will solve the issue with the regparm setting (this is an experimental setting in the kernel config). My apologies, I thought I had specified the beta version. Cheers, James James Scott Sales Engineer - Sangoma Technologies Tel:(905)474-1990 x118 (800)388-2475 x118 Fax:(905)474-9223 MSN:techdesk@sangoma.com www.sangoma.com The TDM Asterisk Card of Choice Rob Pole said the following on 2/28/2005 4:04 PM: > Hi James, > > I am having a problem with the Sangoma ADSL PCI card setup. Firstly I did > not select all protocols, I specified customise, selected PPP and ADSL as I > only want those protocols I need in order to connect to the Internet. After > selecting the protocols I get an error as follows: > Warning: Module installation dir mismatch! > Linux source name - 2.6.9-prep > Current image name = 2.6.9-1.667smp > However it tells me to enter yes to install modules for current image: > 2.6.9-1.677smp (I am runing Fedora Core 3 on a single intel processor box) > > It then continues. I was a little confused when it picks up the current > processor type is i686 - I installed the i386 fedora install files as I > thought my processor was 32-nit - does this message mean this system is in > fact 64-bit and I should have installed the x86 fedora setup files? > > The next error that occurs is the following shortly after: > Warning: ADSL protocol not supported on REGPARM kernel! > > What have I done wrong, and how can I fix this? Can I continue with the > setup? > > Rob > > -----Original Message----- > From: James Scott [mailto:jscott@sangoma.com] > Sent: 28 February 2005 18:59 > To: Rob Pole > Subject: Re: ADSL Card Drivers for Fedora Core 3 > > > Hello, > > You can get the current drivers from ftp.sangoma.com/linux/current_wanpipe/ > > Cheers, > > James > > James Scott > Sales Engineer - Sangoma Technologies > Tel:(905)474-1990 x118 > (800)388-2475 x118 > Fax:(905)474-9223 > MSN:techdesk@sangoma.com > www.sangoma.com > The TDM Asterisk Card of Choice > > Rob Pole said the following on 2/28/2005 11:47 AM: > >>Hi, >> >>I have received a sample card from your distributors in South Africa for >>evaluation without any Driver or documentation. Can you please point me >>to the right place on your web site where I can get the correct drivers >>to get this card working. >> >>Thanks, >>Rob >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel