From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kay Sievers" Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:19:14 +0000 Subject: Re: udev lvm permisions Message-Id: List-Id: References: <1229336451.19633.4.camel@linux-pqqd.site> In-Reply-To: <1229336451.19633.4.camel@linux-pqqd.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 18:18, Scott James Remnant wrote: > On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 18:14 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > >> Yep, and they are racy, we discussed that at the time you did that. It >> seems to work fine for you though, which is good. But I didn't want to >> add that any enterprise release, which we would need to support for >> many years. Device-mapper needs _proper_ udev integration, not a >> "overwrite each-other and the last one wins" solution. :) >> > I don't agree that there's any race here. Should be all in the archives, you never responded that time to my concerns. :) Kay