From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:24:44 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/2] tracing, perf : add cpu hotplug trace events Message-Id: List-Id: References: <1298573197.2428.457.camel@twins> <20110224201124.138311ba@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Alan Cox , Peter Zijlstra , Vincent Guittot , lkml , linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , amit.kucheria@linaro.org, Rusty Russell , Ingo Molnar On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > Anybody who is interested in the latency of cpu hotplug is deluding > > > himself, also cpu hotplug is _NOT_ a power management feature, so the > > > rest of your justification just disappeared as well. > > > > Actually CPU hotplug is a power management feature on some devices where > > you need to shutdown one of the cores to enter low power modes. > > Right. > > > Remember we use it as part of the suspend paths and various processors > > nowdays drop into a suspend to RAM type state on CPU idling. > > The suspend path is using it, but the cpu idle one is hardly using the > hotplug muck. Most SMP ARM processors are going to use it soon. Powering down idle cores provides substantial power saving. Nicolas