From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:33:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/2] tracing, perf : add cpu hotplug trace events Message-Id: List-Id: References: <1298573197.2428.457.camel@twins> <20110224201124.138311ba@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <1298579452.5226.834.camel@laptop> <20110224210431.7a6bba68@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <1298582255.5226.843.camel@laptop> In-Reply-To: <1298582255.5226.843.camel@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Alan Cox , Nicolas Pitre , Vincent Guittot , lkml , linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , amit.kucheria@linaro.org, Rusty Russell , Ingo Molnar On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 22:12 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > If you take down the whole SoC, then it's full S2RAM or some > > equivilant thing. That's a different story and propably requires the > > whole hotplug muck. > > Didn't we, during the whole wakelock trainwreck, that s2ram could be > done from idle as well (for hardware where the whole opportunistic > suspend was sensible to begin with)? Yes, needs some more changes to the whole infrastructure of clocks and power gates, but it's doable. Thanks, tglx