Re: udev fork

Lucas De Marchi
2012-09-12T18:33:23Z

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 06:15:43PM +0000, sickmind@lavabit.com wrote:
>> On 11:05 Wed 12 Sep , Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 05:49:52PM +0000, sickmind@lavabit.com wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I know that many people do not like the way udev development went
>> > > recently,
>> >
>> > What specifically are you objecting to?
>>
>> Extra dependencies and L. Poettering's position that running udev
>> without systemd is a dead end and will not be supported in the future
>> (this seem to be already discussed here before).
>
> What dependencies? Run time? Build time? And why are dependencies
> bad? Do you have no ram in your system for them?
>
> Personally, I think running a Linux system without systemd is a deadend,
> but hey, what do I know about these things? :)
>
>> > > therefore we have a systemd-free fork of udev.
>> >
>> > udev works without systemd running on the system just fine for me,
>> > doesn't it for you?
>>
>> Call me paranoid, but I'm afraid that won't last long.
>
> Fear as a development motivator? That's odd, really?

brain damaged?

Lucas De Marchi