From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:28:36 +0000 Subject: Re: udev issues Message-Id: List-Id: References: <000901c62034$83ee5260$6401a8c0@HomePC> In-Reply-To: <000901c62034$83ee5260$6401a8c0@HomePC> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On 1/23/06, Jim Bodkikns (Dakotacom) wrote: > This is mainly a (pointless) comment. > > > I frankly dont give a damn what dev system is used. But frankly, the > isssues that are caused and not dealt with with the introduction of udev are > entirely unacceptable. They are, to me, symptomatic of a half baked idea. > What is the raw half? Implementation. I am currently running Debian (Sarge) > 2.4.x and cant upgrade to 2.6 because of your 'mess' of a 'solution'. Dont > blame debian. > Hmm, I am running 2.6 and I don't even have udev installed. So again what stops you from upgrading? -- Dmitry ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd_______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel