linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Dergachev <volodya@mindspring.com>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xpert]Re: User-level Tasks in Hotplug Scripts?
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:15:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-hotplug-101283580711339@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-hotplug-101272582331992@msgid-missing>



On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Jim Gettys wrote:

> Fundamentally, we have no convention right now for any client (root or not)
> to connect to an X server except on initiation of the user (unless
> the user is silly enough to disable authentication entirely.
>
> This is an generic X issue (how to delegate authorization to connect).
> There is the xauth mechanism, not very secure, but no convention on its
> use in these circumstances.  There is also support for kerberos, which
> is reasonably secure when used properly.  And there is SSH, which has
> never been integrated into X's world cleanly (and probably should be).
> And there is Owen's scheme for
> some sort of server process, but this presents much the same fundamental
> security/authentication/authorization problem as well.
>
> I don't have a preconcieved
> notion of what the correct solution is; I'm not even very familiar with
> the possibilities.
>
> Certainly, I want no user intervention as much of the time as possible, but
> we also need a hotplug design which allows for user intervention at the
> time of first use in cases where it may be necessary.  The hotplug script
> design needs to allow for this, even if it is not the usual case.
> And there is need to automatically run GUI based programs, even after
> configuration (automatically downloading images off your camera, for
> example).
>
> Personally, I find it very frustrating to have to go looking for a configuration tool before I can use some hardware: this is not something
> a (mere mortal) user knows in advance, and so don't believe the right thing
> to do is necessarily nothing (though for much hardware this may be the correct
> answer, it isn't for most casually used hardware).
>
> We can certainly split this discussion to the different communities
> if people think that is best, but I wanted to get the problem aired;
> there is a problem for each community to mull over at the core of this
> problem.
>
> And someone who sends mail from an address "nogui" certainly has a strong
> opinion on the topic, which may not be universal :-;.
>                                     - Jim


Jim, if the user is logged in so is the rest of the user interface. Why
not have a monitoring program (like console) that watches the hotplug
events and invokes corresponding configuration program ? This would also
allow for various user environments to customize configuration tools to
match their look.

                           Vladimir Dergachev

>
>
> --
> Jim Gettys
> Cambridge Research Laboratory
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> jg@pa.dec.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xpert mailing list
> Xpert@XFree86.Org
> http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
>


_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-02-04 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-03  8:43 [Xpert]Re: User-level Tasks in Hotplug Scripts? Dr Andrew C Aitchison
2002-02-03 17:43 ` Owen Taylor
2002-02-03 19:06 ` Jim Gettys
2002-02-03 19:59 ` Christer Palm
2002-02-03 20:46 ` David Brownell
2002-02-03 21:13 ` David Brownell
2002-02-03 23:49 ` Christer Palm
2002-02-04  5:57 ` Owen Taylor
2002-02-04 15:15 ` Vladimir Dergachev [this message]
2002-02-04 23:17 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-02-05  1:22 ` Christer Palm
2002-02-05  1:54 ` David Brownell
2002-02-05  2:14 ` Christer Palm
2002-02-05  2:41 ` David Brownell
2002-02-05  4:49 ` Vladimir Dergachev
2002-02-05  7:53 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-02-05  8:47 ` Dr Andrew C Aitchison
2002-02-05  8:56 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-02-05 11:21 ` Christer Palm
2002-02-05 11:35 ` Oliver.Neukum
2002-02-05 15:19 ` Jim Gettys
2002-02-05 18:37 ` Jim Carter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-hotplug-101283580711339@msgid-missing \
    --to=volodya@mindspring.com \
    --cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).